As Lebanon enters a presidential vacuum in 2014 and 2022, the problem lies not in the name of the president, but in the political and strategic choices that, most importantly, link Lebanon's destiny and path to the foreign countries that sponsor it. The vacuum is not the result of the crisis of choices between the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah, to name a few, but it is the result of fundamental factors: poor internal relations between the political and parliamentary elements, the regional conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the international conflict between the United States and Iran, and Lebanon directly affected by this issue. affected.
These were the basic problems that prevented the election of the President. Therefore, this party leader is not only upset with his leader, but also not concerned with the refusal of one of them. Talk of opening a window in the wall of crisis to discuss with others is linked to changes affecting these fundamental barriers. Last October, the war file in the region from Gaza to southern Lebanon was discussed.
Between these mines go all the efforts to bring the presidential trophy closer, and bringing the vision closer here means preparing the Lebanese ground necessary for settlement, which inevitably requires a ground to market within Lebanon. From here it is understood what the five-member group of ambassadors of five countries is currently doing. Nabih Perry and his consultation with the five ambassadors, the effort of the national moderate bloc that did not deviate from the proposal of the presidential line and the speaker of the parliament.
Realizing that the criteria for selecting the President are related to larger issues, parliamentary sources attribute its failure to the untenable role of the Five-member Committee. Bringing points of view closer together and narrowing the gaps between the conflicting powers at home to achieve possible solutions soon. Sources from abroad decided to implement its move today to maintain momentum with a modest initiative. Hope to succeed in achieving these goals.
Therefore, the goal of the moderate initiative and the movement of five is not to elect a president and end the vacuum, but to prepare the way for the possibility that this thing will happen from the outside in, here is Qatar's role. The Lebanese scene is notable because the president tried to implement the ceasefire in Gaza, which happened, and according to sources, this too without obstacles.
Sources revealed by Al-Nashra that Qatar's efforts to fulfill the presidency in the event of a cease-fire, so that the president would then focus on each stage of the upcoming negotiations, noted that the obstacles in this issue are nature. It is true that the Shiite duo has repeatedly emphasized that the course of the war has nothing to do with the course of the president, but rather it is first of all related to the direct political relationship, that is, a cease-fire means a cease-fire, or a cease-fire is discussed with pledges and guarantees, and there may still be no room for settlements in the region.
The Americans and Iranians are negotiating in Amman, the Saudis and Iranians are coordinating regional files, moderation, and initiatives between them have set the stage for it. Will this be a presidential summer? Or are there surprises that will topple the presidency and move us to another level?
